ISHN
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to e-News
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  This Just In
  Calendar
  Digital Editions
  Showrooms
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Web Exclusives
  Vendor News
  Product Spotlight
  Buyers Guides
  Resources
  ASSE Bookstore
  The "Checker" Bookstore
  Classifieds
  Career Search
  Archives
  Industrial Safety Video Archive
  e-News Archives
  Sites to See
  White Papers
  Market Research
  Special Collections
  Pandemic Preparedness
  Construction Safety 2010
  For Distributors Only
  Behavioral Safety
  OSHA Resources
  E-Learning
  Convention Companion
  ISHN Info
  Media Kit
  Contact Us
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Did NASA fail to confront hazard?

July 29, 2005

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The recommendations made by space shuttle Columbia's accident investigators following the 2003 incident that killed seven astronauts did not force NASA to confront the “foam debris” problem head-on, the Los Angeles Times reports. The board, according to the Times, told the space agency to "initiate" a program to eliminate foam debris and "initiate" a program to strengthen the orbiter's thermal protection system, but it did not make NASA adopt a 100 percent fix to either system.

On Tuesday large pieces of foam fell off the shuttle Discovery's external fuel tank during launch, causing the agency to essentially ground the shuttle program for the immediate future.

It also appears that in 2003, says the Times report, NASA rejected efforts by outside experts who proposed comprehensive fixes to the foam problem, because the proposals required aggressive redesigns or advanced foam technology that might have required significant investments.

NASA instead chose to fix, at limited cost, an aging launch system that it planned to get rid of by the end of the decade, the Times reports.

Retired Navy Adm. Harold W. Gehman Jr., chairman of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, acknowledged Thursday that the recommendations to NASA left open a window that would have allowed the same scenario of foam debris falling off and damaging the orbiter's thermal protection system.

"We had precious little faith that they could stop this stuff from coming off," Gehman said in an interview. "And lo and behold, they couldn't."

"We decided it was safe to fly as is,” Bill Parsons, manager of the shuttle program, said Wednesday. “Obviously, we were wrong."

John Pike, executive director of GlobalSecurity.org, a research group in Alexandria, Va., said that accident investigators and NASA regarded the shuttle as an old system unworthy of a major investment.

"Most people will not put a lot of money into a car they are planning to get rid of, and the shuttle is an old car we are getting ready to get rid of," Pike said. "They basically looked at the fixes and said, 'This is good enough for government work.'"

NASA officials say they do not know how long it will take to fix the new foam problems or how it could affect the future of the space program. Until those solutions are in hand, the shuttles are not supposed to fly, the Times reports.



|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.




































BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy