Today's News

Activists criticize chemical terror proposal

August 9, 2002
/ Print / Reprints /
/ Text Size+
Public interest groups are protesting a proposal by U.S. Senator Christopher Bond (R-Mo.) titled the "Community Protection from Chemical Terrorism" bill.

The Working Group on Community Right-to-Know attacks it as a "know nothing, do nothing" idea that would conceal dangerous chemical industry practices while doing nothing to protect communities from chemical terrorism.

Across the country, millions of Americans live within areas where a sudden release of industrial chemicals could cause death or serious injury, according to the group.

The group argues that Bond's bill would:

  • Prevent local citizens from finding out which hazardous chemical facilities put their lives and families at risk.

  • Provide no resources, authority or mandate to Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC) to reduce chemical hazards at local facilities.

  • Fail to provide a national response to international terrorism, relying instead on LEPC members, who say they lack the resources, time and expertise to engage local facilities in hazard reduction.

  • Add environmental groups to LEPCs, even though this is already law - "local environmental" and "community" organizations have been required on LEPCs since they were founded by the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986.

  • Depart from the previous position of the American Chemistry Council, which supported the community's right-to-know about dangers posed by their member companies.

  • Prevent people who volunteer to serve on LEPCs from telling the public about the chemical hazards they are working to address.

  • Do nothing to reduce chemical hazard risks or improve site security.

    Activists claim a vigorous federal program is needed to reduce chemical hazards and improve site security. No federal program currently regulates how many people a chemical plant can endanger in nearby communities.

    Senator Jon Corzine (D-N.J.) is proposing to require industrial plant owners to reduce hazards and improve security in the Chemical Security Act, S.1602. Activists content the Bond bill may be intended to block Corzine's bill.

  • Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to ISHN.

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.



    Image Galleries

    Scenes from the World of Safety

    Sights, signs & symbols from the National Safety Congress & Expo held in San Diego, CA, September 15-18

    12/11/14 11:00 am EST

    Why Flame Resistant Workwear? Understanding Workplace Hazards and OSHA Compliance

    By defining the leading causes of flash fires, electric arc and molten metal splatter, we will address the ways in which companies can better protect their employees from such hazards through proper staff outfitting. In the topic, we will discuss the benefits of – and recent developments to – flame-resistant workwear and what to consider when creating a program for your employees.

    ISHN Magazine


    2014 December

    Check out ISHN's last issue of the year, which features articles about distance learning, foot protection and confined space.

    Table Of Contents Subscribe


    M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\ISHN\safetyfourth.jpg
    Safety Engineering, 4th Edition

    A practical, solutions-driven reference, Safety Engineering, 4th edition, has been completely revised and updated to reflect many of today’s issues in safety.

    More Products

    For Distributors Only - SEPTEMBER 2014

    ISHN FDO SEPTEMBER 2014For Distributors Only is ISHN's niche brand standard-sized magazine supplement aimed at an audience of 2,000 U.S. distributors that sell safety products. Circulation only goes to distributors. CHECK OUT THE SEPTEMBER 2014 ISSUE OF FDO HERE


    Facebook logo Twitter YouTubeLinkedIn Google + icon

    ishn infographics

    2012 US workplace deathsCheck out ISHN's new Infographic page! Learn more about worker safety through these interactive images. CLICK HERE to view the page.