Today's News / Transportation Safety

Crew error caused 2010 CN freight train collision in Minnesota

February 14, 2013
KEYWORDS collision / ntsb / railroad
/ Print / Reprints /
/ Text Size+

Railway companies and whistleblowersHuman error by workers caused a 2012 collision of two Canadian National Railway freight trains in Minnesota that injured all five crewmembers on the two trains, according to a report by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

The accident occurred on September 30th, when a southbound CN freight train collided head on with a northbound CN freight train near Two Harbors, Minnesota. The trains were operating in non-signaled track territory. The northbound train had 118 empty iron ore railcars and had been given authority to operate on the single main track. The southbound train had 116 railcars loaded with iron ore and did not have authority to operate on the single main track. As a result of the collision, three locomotives and 14 railcars derailed.

The NTSB found that the crew departed a railroad siding without permission and before the northbound train had passed.

Contributing to the accident was CN’s use of after-arrival track authorities in non-signaled territory, a procedure that is vulnerable to human error and lacks safety redundancies. The NTSB noted crew fatigue and inadequate crew resource management also played a part in the accident.

“Since 1996, the NTSB has investigated four other head-on collisions where after-arrival track authority was causal,” said Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman. “Relying on a system that depends on error-free human performance for safety is a recipe for disaster.”

As a result of the investigation, the NTSB made safety recommendations to the Federal Railroad Administration as well as to several railroad companies and associations, including CN, Union Pacific Railroad, and Norfolk Southern Railroad.

A synopsis of the NTSB report, including the probable cause, findings, and a complete list of the safety recommendations, is available at The full report will be available on the website in several weeks.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to ISHN.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Scenes from the World of Safety

Sights, signs & symbols from the National Safety Congress & Expo held in San Diego, CA, September 15-18

12/11/14 11:00 am EST

Why Flame Resistant Workwear? Understanding Workplace Hazards and OSHA Compliance

By defining the leading causes of flash fires, electric arc and molten metal splatter, we will address the ways in which companies can better protect their employees from such hazards through proper staff outfitting. In the topic, we will discuss the benefits of – and recent developments to – flame-resistant workwear and what to consider when creating a program for your employees.

ISHN Magazine


2014 December

Check out ISHN's last issue of the year, which features articles about distance learning, foot protection and confined space.

Table Of Contents Subscribe


M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\ISHN\safetyfourth.jpg
Safety Engineering, 4th Edition

A practical, solutions-driven reference, Safety Engineering, 4th edition, has been completely revised and updated to reflect many of today’s issues in safety.

More Products

For Distributors Only - SEPTEMBER 2014

ISHN FDO SEPTEMBER 2014For Distributors Only is ISHN's niche brand standard-sized magazine supplement aimed at an audience of 2,000 U.S. distributors that sell safety products. Circulation only goes to distributors. CHECK OUT THE SEPTEMBER 2014 ISSUE OF FDO HERE


Facebook logo Twitter YouTubeLinkedIn Google + icon

ishn infographics

2012 US workplace deathsCheck out ISHN's new Infographic page! Learn more about worker safety through these interactive images. CLICK HERE to view the page.