Food industry workers face a myriad of hazards,
including sharp knives, extreme temperatures and
harsh chemicals as well as the bacteria, grease and
oils inherent in food products. Combined, these
make proper glove usage essential to worker safety.
Keep the food clean
Each year 76 million people in the U.S. experience
food poisoning — and up to 5,000 people die from it.
Anyone who has ever suffered through food poisoning
knows the importance of contamination-free food
sources. Similarly, food industry workers who have
endured cuts, skin irritation and other reactions while
handling food are familiar with the need to protect
their hands from work hazards.
In 2007, rates of work-related injury or illness for
full-time food manufacturing workers were higher than
the rates for all of manufacturing and for the private
sector as a whole. Rates were lower than the manufacturing
average for workers in bakery manufacturing,
and rates were higher in seafood product preparation
and packaging as well as in dairy manufacturing. On
a positive note, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
data indicate that the incidence of injuries and illnesses
reported in the meat industry for 2008 (the most recent
year for which data are available) are the lowest (7.5
injuries per 100 full-time workers per year) since BLS
began recording this data. This is an improvement of
more than 70 percent over the last 17 years.
Hand in glove
Selecting the proper glove for the right application
can help food handlers and food processors improve
worker safety and reduce injury costs while ensuring
safe food products. Wearing gloves prevents the
worker’s hands from getting dirty or injured when
handling food. Gloves also prevent workers, especially
those with open wounds or cuts on their hands
or fingers, from contaminating food.
Glove integrity is key to glove performance in food
processing and food service. Gloves are charged with
keeping food oils and their associated hazards off
workers’ hands and, equally important, keeping potential
human pathogens from workers’ hands out of food.
Even though gloves have also been shown to transfer
or amplify risk, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration
(FDA) believes that hand washing with soap and water
or even using hand sanitizers may not be enough to
prevent the transmission of viral microorganisms.
Various glove types have different efficacies and risk
reduction limitations.
Glove regulations
Gloves used in contact with food are
covered under the Title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR). The FDA
considers it necessary for all food service
and food processing gloves to be covered
under 21 CFR 177 parts 170-199
for repeat contact with food items under
indirect food additive regulations.
The FDA food code recognizes that
various grades of gloves are available for
use by food facilities and considers them to
be either single-use gloves or multiple-use
gloves. The distinction between the two
lies with material durability, strength and
cleanability. Multi-use gloves are required to be durable,
nonabsorbent and resistant to corrosive facility sanitizers.
These gloves must also have sufficient strength to withstand
repeated washing/sanitizing treatments without damage or
decomposition. Both multi- and single-use glove types are
required to be safe for contact with food, and rules do not
permit migration of substance, color or taste to food.
Gloves for the processing environment
Because the food-processing environment is multifaceted,
no one glove can be considered the industry
standard. Workers preparing meat, fish and poultry
need cut resistance. Food handlers working with
extreme temperatures need thermal protection. Industry
teams that sanitize food prep areas need barrier protection
from harsh chemicals. Some workers wear the
same glove over and over. Others, due to cross-contamination
concerns, change gloves 30 or more times in
a work shift. Some workers require ultimate dexterity
while wearing gloves. For others, dexterity is not a
key concern. Here is a quick look at a few of the most
prevalent glove types in the food industry.
CUT-RESISTANT GLOVES: The level of cut protection
needed is generally a product of the application.
Applications such as cutting and deboning demand
performance from advanced fiber and yarn technology
materials such as Spectra and Kevlar or the use of
stainless steel mesh. Advanced fibers such as Spectra
are increasingly popular due the strength and cut
resistance that can be incorporated into gloves through
intricacies of design, knitting configurations and complexity
of blended fibers. These achieve various cutresistance
levels within American Society of Testing
and Materials (ASTM). The ASTM uses cut protection
performance as the approved test to rate performance
and validates product performance and cut level.
DISPOSABLES GLOVES: Most gloves in the foodhandling
environment are disposable. These range in
materials from vinyl to natural rubber latex to nitrile,
with various quality levels within each material category.
Vinyl gloves, for example, can be of minimum
quality for quick, slip-on/slip-off applications or can
be highly engineered with “stretch” formulation and
form-fitting comfort. Nitrile gloves tend to be of
higher quality for unmatched dexterity and reduced
hand fatigue required for a longer wearing period.
GLOVES FOR SANITATION: Workers faced with cleanup
and sanitation responsibilities require yet another
glove type — usually either a heavy-duty disposable
glove or a multi-use glove that provides barrier protection
to keep the sanitizing solutions away from workers’
skin. In some cases, chemical-resistant gloves are
required. Multi-use gloves come lined or unlined, and
some models even offer arm protection.
At a minimum, they are waterproof
and prevent penetration of cleaning
solvents. Gloves for this purpose
are available in materials ranging from
nitrile and natural rubber latex to neoprene
and polyvinyl chloride.
A glove for every hand
With the high rates of both food contamination and
worker injury in the food industry, it is no wonder that
the glove industry has put millions of research dollars
into making sure there is indeed a glove for every hand
involved in the U.S. food supply line.