This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Most safety professionals know OSHA standards as stand-alone requirements. What many safety professionals don’t know is that, during the promulgation of many of these standards, OSHA recognized hazards that have a complementary relationship with other existing standards. One of the best examples of this are two standards that happen to fall into the top 10 most cited standards of 2014 – Lockout/Tagout (LO/TO) and Machine Guarding standards (Subpart O).
To better understand this relationship, let’s first explore the scope and purpose of each standard. The LO/TO standard covers the servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment in the unexpected energization or start-up of machines or equipment, or release of stored energy that could cause injury to employees. The purpose of the LO/TO standard is to control the energy that may be present during the servicing and/or maintenance of machines and equipment to avoid injury through the use of established procedures and techniques.