This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Home » Where’s the evidence? Pre-placement exams lack consensus risk analysis protocols
OSHA has medical screening and surveillance requirements for 24 standards, including asbestos, bloodborne pathogens, cotton dust, HAZWOPER, lead, noise and respiratory protection. Twenty of these standards call for pre-placement examinations. Pre-placement exams depend on specific factors cited in the standard, such as airborne concentrations of the regulated substance and/or years of exposure, amount of time exposed per year, and the age of the employee.
Pre-employment or pre-placement medical exams are intended to place and maintain employees in jobs and work environments suited to their physiological and psychological capacities, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Though OSHA has no requirements for psychological evaluations. The goal of these exams is to determine if an individual is fit to perform his or her job without risk to himself or others.