This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
In this article, the last in a series of four on performance appraisals and how they relate to safety, I want to discuss six psychological factors that prejudice typical performance evaluations. Remember, generic evaluations and rankings won't improve competence - in safety or any other area. Still, becoming aware of these factors can make your evaluations more accurate.
But if everyone gets a similar above-average score on a generic performance evaluation, the rating process has limited value. This is a prime reason for eliminating the traditional evaluation and ranking component of a performance appraisal system.