Today's News

Penalty for tragic trench cave-in: $27,000

Patton Plumbing of Buffalo, N.Y., was fined $27,000 this week following the death of a worker in Hamburg, N.Y., when an unbraced trench caved in March 22, according to the Buffalo News.

The fine represents the amount that OSHA can levy against the company for lapses in workplace safety, Buffalo-area director Arthur J. Dube said. The company was also required to fix the hazardous conditions that inspectors found.

The employer may appeal the fines and dispute the agency's finding of fault.

The incident stemmed from a cave-in that killed Charles M. Lee, Jr., who was replacing a sewer line at a home in Hamburg. The employee was working in a trench 7-1/2 feet deep when the bank collapsed on him, OSHA's inspection records state.

The agency found that the trench lacked cave-in protections, which are required in trenches deeper than five feet, and other workplace safety violations.

According to OSHA, the agency actually cited Mark Patton, a Buffalo plumbing contractor doing business as Patton Plumbing. The citations were for six alleged serious safety violations.

Inspectors found no willful violations of safety rules at Patton Plumbing's work site, Dube said. One $7,000 penalty for lacking cave-in protections would have carried $70,000 in fines if the violation was considered deliberate, he said.

Penalties aren't linked to the severity of injuries in an accident, or whether a safety lapse results in a fatality, Dube said.

“There's no price for a human life — it (penalties) are on a case-by-case basis,” he said.

“Had proper safety procedures been followed, this fatal accident could have been prevented,” Dube added.

In addition to citing a lack of trench cave-in protections, OSHA also determined that:

  • employees had not been trained to recognize trenching hazards;
  • ladders of inadequate length were used to enter and exit the trenches;
  • employees did not wear hardhats while working in the trenches;
  • no tests were conducted to classify the type of soil to determine an appropriate method of collapse protection; and
  • no inspections were conducted by a competent person with the knowledge and authority to identify and correct such hazards.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to ISHN.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Scenes from the World of Safety

Sights, signs & symbols from the National Safety Congress & Expo held in San Diego, CA, September 15-18

3/31/15 11:00 am EST

Changes to NFPA 70E® – What You Need to Know

NFPA ® for Electrical Safety in the Workplace is revised every three years, providing the most up-to-date requirements for safe work practices to reduce exposure to electrical hazards. This program analyzes several significant changes in 70E ® and is designed to clarify the reasoning behind the changes, and assist in determining how the changes impact employees and employers.

ISHN Magazine


2015 March

Check out ISHN's March issue, which features articles about moisture wicking technology, toxic gas detection and fall protection.

Table Of Contents Subscribe


M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\ISHN\safetyfourth.jpg
Safety Engineering, 4th Edition

A practical, solutions-driven reference, Safety Engineering, 4th edition, has been completely revised and updated to reflect many of today’s issues in safety.

More Products

For Distributors Only - January 2015



For Distributors Only is ISHN's niche brand standard-sized magazine supplement aimed at an audience of 2,000 U.S. distributors that sell safety products. Circulation only goes to distributors. 



Facebook logo Twitter YouTubeLinkedIn Google + icon

ishn infographics

2012 US workplace deathsCheck out ISHN's new Infographic page! Learn more about worker safety through these interactive images. CLICK HERE to view the page.