whistleblowerOSHA has filed suit against the Idaho Falls School District, after an employee was fired for questioning whether the timeline of a construction project at a school allowed for the safe removal of asbestos.

Reinstatement, back pay sought

The agency alleges that the 2011 dismissal violated the whistleblower provisions of federal asbestos worker protection law. Filed in the U.S. District Court in Idaho, the complaint seeks the employee's reinstatement and back pay with interest and other damages of more than $300,000. The suit also seeks an order permanently preventing Idaho Falls School District 91 from violating the anti-retaliation provisions of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act.

"Should be appreciated, not condemned"

"Protecting children, teachers and others who care for them at school should be appreciated, not condemned for any reason. The employee who raised safety concerns in this case did a service to the school and the community," said Galen Blanton, deputy regional administrator in Seattle. "Employees have the legal right to raise concerns about safety, health and environmental hazards in the workplace without the fear of reprisal."

Supervisor hostile

The former employee believed the project's timeline would almost certainly have required asbestos removal. His concern was that the schedule would not allow enough time to follow regulations for asbestos removal and that accidental release of dangerous asbestos fibers might occur. After voicing the concern, the suit alleges, the employee's supervisor reacted in a hostile manner toward the employee before he was fired.

Employees who believe that they have been retaliated against for engaging in protected conduct may file a complaint with the secretary of labor to request an investigation by OSHA's Whistleblower Protection Program. Detailed information on employee whistleblower rights is available at http://www.whistleblowers.gov.