ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!
Environmental Health and Safety

Measuring noise impacts has come a long way since the ’60s

Not your father’s dosimeters

By Bob Selwyn
Noise dosimeter technology
February 16, 2018

The following is a brief history and usage of personal noise dosimeters.

1960s

The original OSHA noise regulations CFR 1910:95 in 1969 introduced the requirement to measure the time weighted average noise level over a standard working day to quantify the likelihood of a worker being at risk of measurable hearing loss while at work. Research had established that the higher the noise levels and the longer the exposure time, the greater the risk of workers’ hearing loss.

But how was this new risk going to be measured with the available technology at the time? The standard instrument was the sound level meter, an analog device, possessing a limited dynamic range and very limited measuring capability.

In a noisy environment the attenuator setting was set to start at 90 dB, the suspected level at which noise contributes to hearing loss. With the limited display range of maybe only 20 or possibly 30 dB on scale, a very compressed observable range was available to the user.

Imagine the difficulty of following the rapidly changing needle across an analog display and trying to eyeball the average of a relatively steady signal, let alone a highly variable signal. This made the traditional sound level meter a difficult tool to use. This led a number of electronic manufacturers to enter the health and safety market with designs that produced direct-reading instruments and had the characteristics of the standard sound level meter, yet calculated the average answer another way.

1970s

The 1970s saw the introduction of electronics and early microprocessors to the general market. Some of the newer manufacturers in the safety field realized that these components could be used to provide a direct reading of the TWA as a single number on a display. The physical designs were also changed to locate the microphone on the end of a short cable that could be located on the subject’s shoulder while the measuring instrument was mounted on a belt or in a pocket. The dawn of the dedicated personal noise dosimeter had arrived.

It was relatively easy to make the dosimeters behave like a sound level meter as long as the settings could be designed to simulate the correct frequency weighting, the detector response, the exchange rate for the increasing risk factor of the higher levels, and the cutoff of the low levels that were not needed. A greater challenge to design and program was the user interface, where a display screen showed a single measurable result.

Further development of the dosimeter design soon added the concept of data logging, or storing samples of the noise level at regular intervals throughout the day. Lack of adequate memory at the time manifested itself in the storage of samples taken only at one-minute intervals throughout the day. The first generation of noise dosimeters connected to dot-matrix printers to have a hard copy of the time/history results.

1990s

The inexorable march of progress gave us dosimeters with multiple setup characteristics during the 1990s, such that a single instrument could be configured to measure according to the requirements of both the original OSHA permitted exposure level and the hearing conservation settings with the reduced cutoff at 80 dB that were introduced in the mid-1970s. Previously, it had been a case of choosing one or the other of the settings and repeating the measurement on another day if you wanted to obtain both sets of results for the same worker.

The rise of the personal computer also came about in the 1980s and 1990s, and noise dosimeters manufacturers took advantage of the fact that multiple results could now be stored in memory and downloaded to specific computer programs to produce exposure reports on the individual wearers of the instruments.

2000s

The physical size of the dosimeters and the problems associated with microphone cables getting damaged was significantly reduced with the introduction of the “all-in-one” shoulder-mounted dosimeters in the early 2000s. Early designs of the smaller dosimeter left off the display due to security and space restrictions but users still asked for instruments to be autonomous on site without needing to download to a personal computer first. Some dosimeters had small monochrome displays to read out the key results on screen.

2010-18

Further enhancements to the design of shoulder-mounted dosimeters has led to a new generation of an all-in-one device featuring full color OLED graphic displays, three or more virtual independent dosimeter setups that operate simultaneously. Reduction in memory costs has greatly improved storage capacity, allowing dosimeters to provide years of raw data storage even at one second sampling rates.

Advances in digital signal processing technology have allowed recording the audio content of the sound above user selectable levels for source identification during unattended surveys. It has also allowed the collection of regular octave band spectra at the same time as the TWA and the noise dose results to further aid in the prescription of suitable hearing protectors or noise control activities all from the same measurement. No need to make multiple measurements. Simply collect all necessary data the first time.

KEYWORDS: hearing protection noise

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Bob Selwyn is U.S. vice president of sales and marketing for Casella USA. He joined CEL Instruments Ltd. in 1978 as Northern England area sales engineer. In 1985, he was promoted to UK sales manager and, in 1993, to product manager for CEL until the Casella Group bought CEL Instruments in 1998. He transferred to the U.S. in 2001.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Workplace Training Strategies
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Government Safety Regulations
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Automated loading dock equipment

After March 2026 Rivian Death, Safety Managers Reassess Loading Dock Systems Under OSHA's Warehouse Emphasis Program

psychology in the workplace

Most Workplaces Measure Psychological Safety, Ignoring Psychosocial Risks

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • In the COVID-19 era, a little creativity in training goes a long way

    In the COVID-19 era, a little creativity in training goes a long way

    See More
  • OSHA’s proposed silica rule a long way from being finalized

    See More
  • Dave Johnson’s Safety Beat – 9.1.2010 – safety perception survey; a long way from zero; challenging bad attitudes; who’s stressed?

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119906652.webp

    Alive and Well at the End of the Day: The Supervisor's Guide to Managing Safety in Operations, 2E

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • September 22, 2016

    Bang! Damage from impulse noise and the effectiveness of hearing protection

    Some of the most hazardous sounds we hear are brief sounds – noises from impacts and impulses. These arise from sources like household tools, construction, industrial noise, firecrackers, guns, and even automotive airbags.
  • October 18, 2017

    ACGIH® TLV® For Audible Sound – Understanding the Proposed Notice of Intended Change to The Acgih® Tlv® for Noise

    Occupational noise exposures represent an important but under-recognized cause of disease and disability in the United States. Now titled as Audible Sound, the ACGIH® Threshold Limit Values for Physical Agents (TLV®-PA) Committee has proposed a revision to the TLV® for Noise.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing