This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Editions
    • Archives
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Environment
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Government Regulations
    • Health
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • Product Case Studies
    • Psychology
    • Safety Culture
    • Training
    • Transportation Safety
    • More Topics
  • Construction
  • Oil & Gas
  • Columns
    • Editorial Comments
    • Best Practices
    • Positive Cultures
    • Training Strategies
    • Closing Time
    • FR Protection
    • Thought Leadership
  • Products
  • Conventions
    • Convention Companion
  • Multimedia
    • eBooks
    • Infographics
    • Photo Galleries
    • ISHN Podcasts
    • Your Digital Mentor Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • ISHN YouTube Videos
  • More
    • Awards
      • 2020 Readers' Choice Awards- Submit Products
    • eNewsletters
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Product Case Studies
    • Product Innovations
    • Showrooms
    • Vendor News
  • Advertise
    • Contact
Home » Supreme Court rules dead miner's family entitled to benefits
Today's News

Supreme Court rules dead miner's family entitled to benefits

January 27, 2006
Reprints

Ronnie Charles was killed in 1999 while working for South Akers Mining Co. at Myra in Pike County, Kentucky. A layer of rocks fell on him from an improperly supported mine.

The unanimous Supreme Court ruling upheld previous decisions by the Court of Appeals, the state Workers' Compensation Board and an administrative law judge that AIG/AIU Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh should pay an additional 15 percent in workers’ compensation benefits to Charles' widow and child.

Legal advocates for miners say the importance of the ruling goes beyond the coal industry.

"If there is a worker injured due to an intentional safety violation in any other industry, this ruling would apply to that situation as well," said Steve Sanders, head of the Citizens Appalachian Law Center in Prestonsburg.

The Kentucky Mine Safety Review Commission said after Charles' death that company supervisors placed a higher priority on recovering coal than on safety by ordering the miner to illegally work in an area susceptible to a roof collapse.

The commission revoked the credentials of two of the company's mine managers after the accident.

In the Supreme Court case, the question was whether an insurance carrier is responsible for paying increased death benefits under Kentucky's workers' compensation law if an insurance policy says otherwise.

AIG/AIU Insurance argued that terms of the policy with South Akers Mining excluded such coverage. The insurance policy spelled out that South Akers Mining would be responsible for payment in excess of benefits paid out by workers' compensation law if the company breaks safety laws or regulations.

Dennis R. McGlincy, a Louisville attorney representing the insurance company, argued that the state law requiring increased compensation was enacted to promote workplace safety by penalizing companies for safety violations. Therefore, he said, money paid out under the statute is a penalty for which the company is liable, rather than compensation to an injured worker or surviving family members.

The Supreme Court disagreed, saying the payment of increased benefits is not punitive but merely serves to compensate the victim.

Subscribe to ISHN Magazine

Related Articles

Lawyers group wants Postville prosecutions revisited following Supreme Court's identity theft ruling (5/7)

OSHA's new recordkeeping rule: Who's entitled to privacy?

Subscribe For Free!
  • Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • ISHN eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

Today's News

2 young part-time UPS workers killed in California

Today's News

Steel worker injured at Indiana plant

crystal ball

Safety and health trends for 2020

Tesla

Report finds worker injuries are “routine” at Tesla’s Nevada plant

Lendlease

Humorous workplace safety campaign features mothers

ISHN Readers' Choice Awards 2020 product submissions


Events

March 7, 2019

Safety and Wellness: The Combination that Drives Engagement and Profitability

On Demand Attend this webinar for the keys to success, as well as mistakes to avoid, when targeting safety and wellness with a Recognition & Reward Program.

View All Submit An Event

ISHN Podcasts


ISHN Podcasts

ISHN Magazine

ISHN1219_cover.jpg

2019 December

Among the articles in the December 2019 issue of ISHN Magazine, we have expert insight on selecting the right respirator, a link to the 2020 Buyers’ & Resource Guide, 10 safety mistakes that can land you in a courtroom, and much more.
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • List Rental
    • Safety A-Z
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Web Exclusives
    • Privacy Policy
  • Want More
    • Connect
    • Subscribe
    • Survey And Sample

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing