ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!
Today's Safety NewsGovernment Safety RegulationsEnvironmental Health and Safety

Bill to improve black lung benefits process introduced in Congress

Democrat from Pa. seeks to address “resource disparities” between coal companies, claimants

December 1, 2014

Congressional Democrats have introduced a measure designed to streamline the process for miners filing benefits claims under the Black Lung Benefits Act – and to help miners overcome the “resource disparities” between themselves and the coal companies who use legal maneuvering to block the miners’ claims.

Introduced by Rep. Matt Cartwright (D-PA), the ‘‘Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2014’’ (H.R. 5751) would make substantial changes to the way claims are filed and adjudicated and would include the establishment of a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) program that would provide unbiased evidence for particularly severe cases of pneumoconiosis – the group of mining-related pulmonary diseases commonly known as ‘‘black lung disease.’

Complex litigation

The Black Lung Benefits Act was enacted to provide health care and modest benefits to coal miners who develop pneumoconiosis resulting from exposure to coal dust during their employment.

H.R. 5751 notes that the determination of a claimant’s eligibility for these benefits often requires complex, adversarial litigation. “Resource disparities between coal companies and such claimants are widespread within the statutory and regulatory framework of such Act. Comprehensive reforms are necessary to ensure that coal miners are not at a disadvantage when filing claims for benefits.”

Evidence key to claims process

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has found that many claimants are not equipped with the medical and legal resources necessary to develop evidence to meet the requirements for benefits. Miners often lack complete and reliable medical evidence, consequently increasing the risk that the individuals who review claims for benefits will be presented with insufficient medical evidence.

“Similarly, without better options for legal representation, significant numbers of such claimants proceed with their claims through a complex and potentially long administrative process without resources that Department of Labor officials and black lung disease experts note are important for developing evidence and supporting their claims.”

Fewer than 25% of claimants are represented by an attorney when filing a claim.

“Absent efforts to remedy administrative problems and address structural weaknesses in the process for obtaining benefits, claimants with meritorious claims will not receive benefits.”

Mine operators withheld medical evidence

The measure would require the full disclosure of medical information related to a claim – relevant evidence that has, in some cases, been withheld by mine operators’ legal representatives, according to records of adjudications. In at least some of the cases examined, the disclosure of such evidence would have substantiated a miner’s claim for bene fits. Additionally, withholding medical information “can endanger miners by depriving them of important information about their own health and the potential need to seek medical treatment.”

At Johns Hopkins: Misread x-rays, high fees

The bill alludes to a scandal involving Johns Hopkins Medicine, in which a physician who was paid by coal companies to interpret chest x-rays for black lung incidence was found to be wrong in at least 100 cases. Despite the fact that the rate of black lung disease among miners is on the rise, Dr. Paul Wheeler, head of the Hopkins unit that reads x-rays in black lung cases, testified in court that the last time he found a case of severe black lung was in the 1970's or early 80's. Wheeler was paid approximately ten times the usual amount to interpret x-rays. (Johns Hopkins Medicine suspended its black lung program after the discrepancies came to light.)

“Investigations have uncovered that there are NIOSH-certified B Readers who have systematically misclassified chest radiographs while employed by coal operators or their law firms for the purpose of opposing claims under such Act. In response, the Department of Labor has directed claims examiners ‘not to credit negative chest x-ray readings for pneumoconiosis’ by one widely used physician employed at a prominent medical center unless the conclusions of such physician ‘have been rehabilitated.’  Where chest radiographs are needed to establish entitlement to benefits, claimants should have access to accurate interpretations so as to ensure the fair adjudication of such claims.”

Although miners are barred from filing a new claim one year after a decision, H.R. 5751 would allow those whose claims were rejected due to “a certain physician whose interpretations have since been determined by the Department of Labor to be generally not worthy of credit” to do just that.

KEYWORDS: black lung miners safety and health NIOSH

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Workplace Training Strategies
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Construction Industry Safety and Health
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Worker Impairment

How to Tell When a Co-Worker is Impaired? A Safety Pro’s Challenge

Automated loading dock equipment

After March 2026 Rivian Death, Safety Managers Reassess Loading Dock Systems Under OSHA's Warehouse Emphasis Program

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • Bill to address health care workplace violence introduced in Congress

    See More
  • Sick miners denied black lung benefits due to Johns Hopkins' x-ray findings

    See More
  • Feds announce black lung benefits reforms

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 111894948X.jpg

    Guidelines for Implementing Process Safety Management, 2nd Edition

  • 1119906652.webp

    Alive and Well at the End of the Day: The Supervisor's Guide to Managing Safety in Operations, 2E

See More Products
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing