ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!
Today's Safety NewsTransportation Safety

NTSB: Positive train technology would have prevented Bronx train derailment

Some in railroad industry say it's too costly

December 10, 2013

National Transportation Safety BoardPositive train control technology – which some in the railroad industry have opposed due to its cost – would have prevented the fatal Dec. 1st derailment in New York, according to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which has finished its on-scene investigative work.

An examination of the black box data recorder recovered from the wreckage at the Bronx crash site found that the seven-car Metro-North train was traveling at 82 miles per hour in a 30-mile-per-hour zone when it derailed while navigating a sharp curve. The incident killed four people and injured 63 others.

The "dead-man" switch

A mechanical inspection of the train uncovered no anomalies. There were also none found with the tracks or with the signal system. Investigators examined car 6222, the lead car in which the engineer controlled the train. The “dead-man” switch, a foot-pedal on the floor of the cab that must be depressed to keep the train moving was evaluated. The pedal moved and released as expected. No anomalies were noted. In addition, the control key switch worked as designed. The team also conducted a site/distance test and found no problems with visibility.

Train didn't have positive train technology

As a result, “the NTSB believes that if positive train control technology (PTC)  was installed on this line and train, it would have required the engineer to slow the train to an appropriate speed or stop the train in the event the engineer did not do so, likely preventing the derailment.”

The train’s engineer, William Rockefeller, is a 20-year-veteran of Metro North. Rockefeller admitted to “nodding off” or “zoning out” before the accident, according to Anthony Bottalico, General Chairman of the Association of Commuter Rail Employees (ACRE).

A federal requlation requires the installation of PTC -- which uses computer and satellite tracking to overcome human error -- by the end of 2015. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority which controls the Metro-North railroad said it is in the process of installing the technology.

Some railroads object to cost

The regulation been met with opposition by the railroad industry, which estimates that installing it will cost billions.  A Government Accountability Office report issued several months ago found that most railroads will not meet the deadline.

“America’s railroads remain committed to implementing PTC and are doing all they can to address the challenges that have surfaced,” according to a statement released by the Association of American Railroads, although not everyone in the industry agrees.

Some railroad companies said the cost of implementing PTC (estimated at $2 billion for two dozen commuter rail services in the U.S.) has forced them to cancel necessary repairs, capitol improvements, and services.

The NTSB has been advocating for PTC for more than 20 years and it is on its Most Wanted List of transportation improvements. More information can be found at www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl8_2012.html.

Crew members "cooperative"

Investigators completed interviews with all crew members and said all  have been “cooperative and forthcoming.”

“All said it was a normal run until shortly before the derailment sequence. Investigators are still awaiting results of crew drug tests and cellphone records.”

Investigators also interviewed the engineer of a train that passed the accident train, 8808, near Riverton at about 7:11 a.m. That engineer said the headlight on train 8808 was on high and the engineer did not dim his light as is required by Metro-North.

Mechanical examinations, such as shop testing of the of dead-man switch, inspection and testing of speed sensors and tachometer rings, the brake control unit, and the propulsion controller from the control car have been completed. No anomalies were found.

Passenger interviews continue

The NTSB go-team now heads back to Washington, D.C., although it will continue to gather factual information and investigators will return to New York as needed for follow-up work. The Board plans to continue interviewing passengers, Metro-North employees who were riding on the accident train and first responders. Passengers are invited to email eyewitnessreport@ntsb.gov.

Investigators will also take 3-D scans of the damaged cars and locomotive for use in a digital accident re-creation and for detailed measurements.

 “Our goal is to ultimately make future improvements in the design of passenger rail cars.”

KEYWORDS: railroad industry safety train safety

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Facility Safety
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Occupational Safety
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Worker Impairment

How to Tell When a Co-Worker is Impaired? A Safety Pro’s Challenge

Automated loading dock equipment

After March 2026 Rivian Death, Safety Managers Reassess Loading Dock Systems Under OSHA's Warehouse Emphasis Program

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • Proper machine guarding would have prevented amputation

    See More
  • Safety mechanisms would have prevented worker's death

    See More
  • Updating valves would have prevented serious ExxonMobil worker injuries

    See More
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing