ISHN
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to e-News
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  This Just In
  Calendar
  Digital Editions
  Showrooms
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Web Exclusives
  Vendor News
  Product Spotlight
  Buyers Guides
  Resources
  ASSE Bookstore
  The "Checker" Bookstore
  Classifieds
  Career Search
  Archives
  Industrial Safety Video Archive
  e-News Archives
  Sites to See
  White Papers
  Market Research
  Special Collections
  Pandemic Preparedness
  Construction Safety 2010
  For Distributors Only
  Behavioral Safety
  OSHA Resources
  E-Learning
  Convention Companion
  ISHN Info
  Media Kit
  Contact Us
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Revisiting Heinrich's 'Accident Triangle'


January 31, 2003

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Rather than focus on compliance, concentrate on safety fundamentals


H.W. Heinrich changed the world of safety fundamentals forever with his pioneering work in the 1930s. One of his concepts that continues to make me think is his accident triangle (pyramid) - for every 300 unsafe acts there are 29 minor injuries and one major injury.

It's the concept that we all are familiar with. So many near misses lead to an analogous number of first aid injuries and onward through the logic to recordables and ending in the inevitability of a fatality.

This inevitability of disaster has always bothered me. If I cross the railroad tracks too many times I will die, or drive to work too many times or something else like that. I am not a fatalist, so what is there that will enable the industrial workplace to overcome this fatalistic teaching?

My work with companies and individuals that have done both well and poorly in safety always leads to individual behaviors as a key factor after workplace conditions, training and safety standards are addressed. So how do we attack the fatalism of Heinrich's triangle?

If we build a safety triangle (pyramid) on the "stone" of excellent fundamentals that modify behaviors and actions, we can limit the base of improper activities that lead to 98 percent of the injuries in Heinrich's model. Each time I have gone down this road the results have been similarly excellent.



Focus on fundamentals

The fundamentals of upper management visibility in safety, middle management involvement, focused supervisory performance, hourly employee active involvement and training that both teaches and reinforces these basics of excellence has significantly reduced injuries. The approach has direct similarities to the six sigma process of continuous improvement (define, measure, act, improve, control). Here's how it applies to safety:

  • Define the correct behaviors that eliminate unsafe acts and injuries;
  • Train all personnel in these behaviors;
  • Measure that personnel are indeed doing these correct behaviors;
  • Reward their accomplishments of these correct behaviors.

By eliminating dangerous behaviors there are never enough dangerous actions to get us to a more serious level of safety injuries in Heinrich's pyramid. The key is to not focus on compliance, or reward "acceptable injury levels/goals." Instead, concentrate on the fundamentals that eliminate the activities/behaviors that move us up the Heinrich inevitability triangle.



|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

































BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy