Risk calculating
I knew he was right. The personal cost my
son experienced to comply with my request
to wear pads (from his perspective) was:
a) discomfort; b) inhibited performance; c)
inconvenience; and d) looking silly (with the
bulging knees and elbows). In contrast, dad’s
approval was the sole benefit of compliance.
The cost/benefit ratio shows a greater cost for safety.
When costs outweigh benefits, safety-related behavior
does not happen.
Principle 1: Safety-related behavior
is often less convenient, less comfortable,
and provides
less dexterity than the
more risky alternative.
But what could possibly
be more important than dad’s
approval? After an investigation of
his skateboard world I found out.
Skateboarding magazines contain
the ultra-cool boarding professionals
photographed in impossible
aerial poses, all with rock-star hair,
the hottest gear, and… no pads
(and rarely helmets).
Surely, this wasn’t influencing
my son. But when I took him to
the county’s new skate park, I
saw other kids had the tricks, the
styles, even the laughter of the
pros… all with the absence of
pads and helmets.
Principle 2: We are
influenced by others,
especially if they are
considered “cool.”
So I did what any dad would
do. I declared a “threat.” “You
WILL wear your pads when
skateboarding or you will….
never… skateboard… again (echo
here).” And he complied, or so I
thought. The next week I drove
up the driveway to see my son
taking his pads off after boarding.
It was an illusion squashed when
his younger brother tattled that
he had just spent the afternoon
boarding without pads. When he
saw my car he ran to his pads and
shoved them on.
Principle 3: Threats
and discipline are only
effective when the disciplinarian
is present.
My threats did not work so I upped the ante. I
proceeded to contact the county parks director and
county commissioners announcing myself as a safety
professional and detailing what I had seen at the skate
park — how unsafe behaviors were being modeled,
and how there were no policies or signs requiring helmet
and pad use in the skate park. I was not the only
one protesting.
Soon the county commissioners passed a law: all
patrons of the skate park must wear helmets and
pads. Up went the verbose sign with the new statute.
Nothing changed.
Principle 4: Policies and signs
only direct behavior, they do not
motivate safe behavior.
They cannot without consequences (see Principle
3 to review what happens to consequence without
oversight). Is the only solution to have a consequence
provider watching at all times?
That’s what happened. The county hired a security
guard to enforce the new safety policy.