ISHN
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to e-News
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  This Just In
  Calendar
  Digital Editions
  Showrooms
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Web Exclusives
  Vendor News
  Product Spotlight
  Buyers Guides
  Resources
  ASSE Bookstore
  The "Checker" Bookstore
  Classifieds
  Career Search
  Archives
  Industrial Safety Video Archive
  e-News Archives
  Sites to See
  White Papers
  Market Research
  Special Collections
  Pandemic Preparedness
  Construction Safety 2010
  For Distributors Only
  Behavioral Safety
  OSHA Resources
  E-Learning
  Convention Companion
  ISHN Info
  Media Kit
  Contact Us
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Long road to a combustible dust standard (1/27)

January 27, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



OSHA has scheduled two informal stakeholder meetings to solicit comments and suggestions on combustible dust hazards in the workplace. OSHA will use comments from these meetings in developing a proposed standard for combustible dust. The meetings are scheduled for Feb. 17, 2010, 9 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., at the Marriott Perimeter Center, 246 Perimeter Center Parkway, Atlanta, Ga., 30346.

Combustible dust will be another high-profile standards-setting story in 2010. It is hard to ignore the statistics: Since 1980, more than 130 workers have been killed and more than 780 injured in combustible dust explosions. A Feb. 7, 2008, explosion at an Imperial Sugar Co. plant in Port Wentworth, Ga., killed 14 people and resulted in OSHA issuing nearly $8.8 million in penalties.

OSHA is holding the stakeholder meeting in Atlanta to make it easy for victims’ families and others with relevant information about this deadly incident to attend.

Combustible dust rulemaking will be a rocky road. The American Industrial Hygiene Association has weighed in:

“It remains to be seen if a single combustible dust standard can be an effective way to protect workers from combustible dust explosions in all industries. AIHA recommends the agency consider all comments from the various industries impacted by combustible dust to be certain that a single combustible dust standard is workable in all industries. There may be considerable concerns that a single-industry standard will not be effective in controlling combustible dust explosions.”

An American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) representative testified during an OSHA hearing on a proposed combustible dust standard that ASSE can support a new standard, but only one that is no less effective than the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA) voluntary consensus standards addressing combustible dust.

ASSE federal representative Adele Abrams said, “ASSE can support a new combustible dust standard but only one that is no less effective than the NFPA’s voluntary consensus standard NFPA 654: Standard on Prevention of Fire and dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids.

Abrams went on to note that most importantly, the NFPA dust explosion standards are categorized according to industry.

“We do not see how a single standard or a standard that seeks to provide an overarching framework to the existing standards can work better than what has already been accomplished in the NFPA standards,” Abrams said. “Also, an industry-specific approach is more consistent with international approaches such as the European Union’s ATEX guidelines. This is an important consideration as OSHA moves towards global harmonization of hazard communications and other safety and health management systems.

“OSHA plays an important role in helping advance improved harmonization with international standards that help this nation’s employers compete better in global marketplaces, and this role cannot be overlooked,” she said.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.































BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy