ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!

Case study: Fall protection

June 1, 2004
It was 3:00 in the afternoon on a typical, windy mid-November day last fall. The Chicago winter had yet to take full effect, which allotted some final bridge work to be completed.

Standing approximately 160 feet above the lower level, the height of the bridge had raised concern from the safety director. Because of this forethought earlier in the year, the safety director had contacted his local safety system specialist to devise a solution in case one of his workers would need to be rescued from a fall. He had already mandated all workers to use a personal fall arrest system (PFAS) when working from the bridge. Was this enough to save a life if necessary?

One step too many

While working from a suspended scaffold, the workers were to detach cables that were used in prior stages of the construction process. This required the removal of certain brackets that held these heavy cables in place. While not an extremely difficult task, workers needed to be very careful due to the extreme winds as well as the height of the bridge.

The first few cables were removed smoothly without incident; however, this was not the case for all of them. When a worker removed the next bracket, the cable began to slide. Due to the size and weight of the cable, the worker could not halt the cable from sliding out of his reach. As he reached to save the cable from falling to the ground, he found himself taking one step too many and he fell off the suspended scaffold.

Fortunately, the worker was properly wearing his full body harness, which was connected to a self-retracting lanyard. His safety equipment managed to stop him within just a few feet from the leading edge. He was fortunate that he did not plummet more than 150 feet to an almost certain death.

But was he really safe at this point? After all, he was now dangling approximately 150 feet from the ground and was awaiting a rescue by his coworkers.

To the rescue

Because the bridge was 160 feet above the lower level, it was not feasible to reach the fallen worker from the ground. They would have to reach him from the bridge deck. As part of the rescue plan, the safety director had acquired several MSA Suretymanâ„¢ Rescue Utility Systems to be strategically placed throughout the working areas on the bridge. In short, this is a rescue system that is primarily used for raising and lowering people. The unit offers a mechanical advantage of 4:1. Specifically, if the victim with all his tools weighs 200 pounds, then the necessary lifting strength will be just 50 pounds.

The fallen victim’s counterpart immediately went to retrieve the rescue utility system from the storage bag and connect it to an anchorage just above the bridge level. Since the safety director had already calculated the total fall distance that a typical individual would encounter, the system was preset to that length.

The rescuer lowered the rescue utility system to the conscious victim. (If the victim was unconscious, the rescue plan would have to be implemented in a different way.) The victim then attached the carabiner from the rescue utility system to the D-ring of his harness. After the victim gave the signal that he was now attached to the rescue utility system, the rescuer, standing above at a safe working level, began to pull him up to the surface of the bridge where the fallen worker could climb to safety.

From the time the worker fell until the time he reached safety no more than 15 minutes elapsed. A follow-up examination revealed no injury to the victim; he was just a little shaken up due to the shock of what had happened.

Are you ready?

What could have happened if the crew had no rescue plan? More than likely, the coworkers would have had to call the local fire company to come to the bridge. This may not have been the best solution for a couple of reasons. First, no one knew for sure what the expertise level of that particular local fire company was for saving someone under those circumstances. Also, how long would it take for the rescue squad to reach the bridge to help the victim? Ten minutes? 20 minutes? Longer?

When a victim is brought to safety, there is a tendency to lay the person down in a prone position. This creates a surge of de-oxygenated blood to the heart, resulting in potentially severe shock. The consequences of suspension after a fall can be serious, especially if the worker is immobile or unconscious. To reduce the risk of post-fall suspension trauma, it is essential to have a rescue plan in place and the means to implement it in an emergency.

As this example shows, a properly executed fall protection program and rescue plan can turn potential tragedy into nothing more than a good scare.

SIDEBAR: Time-critical

Time becomes critical for fallen victims as some people suffer more bodily harm due to the length of time they remain suspended from their fall than they do from the fall itself. After a certain period, depending on the individual, a condition called venous pooling may occur.

When the victim falls, the majority of the harness support is in the lower region of the body by the leg straps. This is by design since the upper leg area is one of the strongest regions of the human body. The pressure of the leg straps decreases blood flow to the lower portion of the legs, which creates a dangerous pooling effect.

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Facility Safety
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Occupational Safety
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Worker Impairment

How to Tell When a Co-Worker is Impaired? A Safety Pro’s Challenge

psychology in the workplace

Most Workplaces Measure Psychological Safety, Ignoring Psychosocial Risks

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • NIOSH to study use of fall protection equipment by oil and gas extraction workers

    See More
  • Diversified fall protection, leaders in engineered fall protection solutions and training services, rolls out new line of portable fall arrest systems

    See More
  • Fall protection systems by Diversified Fall Protection

    See More
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing