ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!
Today's Safety News

Reactives need tighter regulation, says U.S. chemical safety board

October 11, 2002
The U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board has concluded, after studying 167 serious incidents involving uncontrolled chemical reactivity from January 1980 to June 2001, that reactive incidents are a significant chemical safety problem.

OSHA's process safety management standard (PSM) has significant gaps in coverage of reactive hazards because it is based on a limited list of individual chemicals with inherently reactive properties, according to the board.

Given the impact and diversity of reactive hazards, "optimum progress in the prevention of reactive incidents requires both enhanced regulatory and nonregulatory programs," according to the board's report.

Forty-eight of these incidents resulted in a total of 108 fatalities. The data include an average of six injury-related incidents per year, resulting in an average of five fatalities annually. Nearly 50 of the 167 incidents affected the public, and more than 50 percent involved chemicals not covered by existing OSHA or EPA process safety regulations.

Other conclusions:

  • NFPA instability ratings are insufficient as the sole basis for determining coverage of reactive hazards in the OSHA PSM Standard.

  • The EPA Chemical Accident Prevention Requirements (40 CFR 68) have significant gaps in coverage of reactive hazards.

  • Using lists of chemicals is an inadequate approach for regulatory coverage of reactive hazards. Improving reactive hazard management requires that both regulators and industry address the hazards from combinations of chemicals and process-specific conditions rather than focus exclusively on the inherent properties of individual chemicals.

  • Reactive incidents are not unique to the chemical manufacturing industry. They also occur in many other industries where chemicals are stored, handled or used.

  • Neither the OSHA PSM Standard nor the EPA Risk Management Program regulation explicitly require specific hazards, such as reactive hazards, to be examined when performing a process hazard analysis.

  • Given that reactive incidents are often caused by inadequate recognition and evaluation of reactive hazards, improving reactive hazard management involves defining and requiring relevant factors (e.g., rate and quantity of heat and gas generated) to be examined within a process hazard analysis.
  • Share This Story

    Looking for a reprint of this article?
    From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

    Recommended Content

    JOIN TODAY
    to unlock your recommendations.

    Already have an account? Sign In

    • forklift safety

      Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

      With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
      Facility Safety
      By: Josh Cramer
    • welding

      All about welder’s flash or arc eye

      A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
      Environmental Health and Safety
    • dangerous jobs

      The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

      On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
      Construction Industry Safety and Health
      By: Benita Mehta
    Manage My Account
    • eMagazine Subscriptions
    • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
    • Online Registration
    • Manage My Preferences
    • Subscription Customer Service

    More Videos

    Sponsored Content

    Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

    close
    • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
      Sponsored byOHD

      5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

    • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
      Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

      Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

    • lone worker in confined space
      Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

      GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

    Popular Stories

    SpaceX 7 launch

    OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

    Automated loading dock equipment

    After March 2026 Rivian Death, Safety Managers Reassess Loading Dock Systems Under OSHA's Warehouse Emphasis Program

    psychology in the workplace

    Most Workplaces Measure Psychological Safety, Ignoring Psychosocial Risks

    top 10 most dangerous jobs

    Poll

    Seasonal Readiness

    With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
    View Results Poll Archive

    Products

    Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

    Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

    See More Products

    ISHN Podcasts

    Related Articles

    • US_CSB_Yenkin_Thumb1.jpg

      U.S. Chemical Safety Board Releases New Safety Video on the Fatal Combustible Dust Explosions and Fires at Didion Milling in Cambria, Wisconsin

      See More
    • chemical safety

      U.S. Chemical Safety Board Opens Investigation into Fatal Chemical Incident at West Virginia Facility

      See More
    • ASSE: We stand behind U.S. Chemical Safety Board

      See More

    Related Products

    See More Products
    • 2016_WM.jpg

      ANSI/ASSE Z9.11-2016 Laboratory Decommissioning

    See More Products
    ×

    Become a Leader in Safety Culture

    Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

    JOIN TODAY
    • RESOURCES
      • Advertise
      • Contact Us
      • Directories
      • Manufacturing Division
      • Store
      • Want More
    • SIGN UP TODAY
      • Create Account
      • eMagazine
      • Newsletters
      • Customer Service
      • Manage Preferences
    • SERVICES
      • Marketing Services
      • Reprints
      • Market Research
      • List Rental
      • Survey/Respondent Access
    • STAY CONNECTED
      • LinkedIn
      • Facebook
      • YouTube
      • X (Twitter)
    • PRIVACY
      • PRIVACY POLICY
      • TERMS & CONDITIONS
      • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
      • PRIVACY REQUEST
      • ACCESSIBILITY

    Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing