Risk Management

RSS

Across safety, distribution, and manufacturing, the pressure feels familiar. Systems are moving faster. Information is coming from everywhere. And now, layered on top of all of that, comes Artificial Intelligence — or what many of us are starting to call Digital Intelligence (DI). For many professionals, the reaction is mixed.

When small hazards fade into the environment, they stop being treated as signals that something needs to change.

Winter storms cost U.S. businesses billions each year—one major storm alone can result in $1 billion in lost productivity and damages.

The Society will continue focusing its lens on the Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIF) and Potential Serious Injuries and Fatalities (PSIF) that continue to disrupt operations and end lives.

Several research studies have identified that workers (as well as management) have different perspectives on risk and the potential negative resulting outcomes from exposure to them.

Senior EHS leaders discuss the evolving landscape of serious injury and fatality prevention, artificial intelligence in safety, and the rise of human-centric risk strategies.

It’s time to toughen up buttercups. Trump 2.0 dismantling of traditional OHS as we knew it, is far from complete.

Both PTW and JSA are designed to prevent incidents by identifying hazards and ensuring that appropriate controls are in place. Given their overlapping functions, a natural question arises: is it really necessary to use both PTW and JSA for the same task?

Scientific papers offer actionable insights into utilizing technology to improve workplace safety and reduce risk. 

Our excessive focus on the concept of risk comes at the expense of fostering the essential leadership needed to navigate acceptable levels of risk.