ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!

Lockout/Tagout and machine guarding

By Wesley J. Maertz
April 1, 2015
Most safety professionals know OSHA standards as stand-alone requirements. What many safety professionals don’t know is that, during the promulgation of many of these standards, OSHA recognized hazards that have a complementary relationship with other existing standards. One of the best examples of this are two standards that happen to fall into the top 10 most cited standards of 2014 – Lockout/Tagout (LO/TO) and Machine Guarding standards (Subpart O).

Scope and purpose

To better understand this relationship, let’s first explore the scope and purpose of each standard. The LO/TO standard covers the servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment in the unexpected energization or start-up of machines or equipment, or release of stored energy that could cause injury to employees. The purpose of the LO/TO standard is to control the energy that may be present during the servicing and/or maintenance of machines and equipment to avoid injury through the use of established procedures and techniques.

The machine guarding standard covers any machine where machine parts, functions or processes may present hazards created by ingoing nip points, motions (rotating, reciprocating, transversing), actions (cutting, punching, shearing, bending), flying chips and sparks resulting in injury. Its purpose is to protect the machine operator and other employees in the work area from these hazards by use of a type of safeguard technique compliant with the machine guarding standard.

Safeguards fall into five main categories: guards, devices, safety controls, gates, and location/distance.

Safeguards must meet these minimum general requirements:

1. Prevent contact: The safeguard must prevent hands, arms or any other part of a worker’s body from making contact with dangerous moving parts.

2. Be secure: Workers should not be able to easily remove or tamper with the safeguard. Guards and safety devices should be made of durable materials that will withstand normal use. They must be firmly secured to the machine where possible or secured elsewhere if attachment to the machine is not possible.

3. Protect from falling objects: The safeguard should ensure that no objects can fall into moving parts.

4. Create no new hazards: A safeguard defeats its purpose if it creates a hazard such as a shear point, a jagged edge or an unfinished surface.

5. Create no interference: Any safeguard that impedes a worker from performing a job quickly and comfortably might soon be bypassed or disregarded. Proper safeguarding can actually enhance efficiency because it relieves a worker’s injury apprehensions.

6. Allow safe lubrication: If possible, one should be able to lubricate the machine without removing the safeguard. Locating oil reservoirs outside the guard, with a line leading to the lubrication point, will reduce the need for the operator or maintenance worker to enter the hazardous area.

Now that we know the scope and purpose of each standard and what a safeguard should do, we need to know when a standard and safeguard may apply during an activity being performed. OSHA has identified two key activities that are performed. The first activity is called normal production. This is defined as any utilization of a machine or equipment to perform its intended purpose. The second activity is call servicing and/or maintenance. This is defined as any action that is necessary to prepare or maintain a machine or equipment such as: installing, setting up, inspecting, adjusting, repairing, replacing, constructing, modifying, lubricating, cleaning, unjamming, or pretty much any activity outside the definition of normal production.

Servicing and/or maintenance

As a general principle, the LO/TO standard does not apply to servicing and/or maintenance activities when employees are not exposed to hazardous energy. OSHA has identified six circumstances where employees are not exposed to hazardous energy:

1. Complying with LO/TO 29 CFR 1910.147;

2. Complying with the minor servicing exception to the LO/TO standard contained in the note found in 29 CFR 1910.147(a)(2)(ii)(B);

3. Utilizing the cord and plug connected equipment or hot tap exemptions found in 29 CFR 1910.147(2)(iii)(A) and (B) respectively;

4. Effective machine guarding, in compliance with Subpart O, that eliminates or prevents employee exposure from the hazardous energy associated with the machines or equipment;

5. Final actions granting LO/TO standard variances or;

6. Other applicable portions of Part 1910 that prevent employee exposure to hazardous energy.

As listed in number four, an employer may avoid the requirements of the LO/TO standard for servicing and/or maintenance activities if they eliminate exposure to hazards by using safeguarding techniques compliant with OSHA’s machine guarding standard. However, any time a guard is removed or bypassed, compliance with LO/TO is again required. This would include practices such as reaching around guards while equipment is energized. This practice could expose the operator to hazardous mechanical energy. Rule of thumb dictates under no circumstances is any part of an employee’s body ever permitted to be exposed within a hazardous area, such as the point-of-operation or in-going nip point area, during servicing and/or maintenance activities while the machine is running or energized.

Machine guarding requirements complement the requirements of the LO/TO standard. During the promulgation of the LO/TO standard, OSHA recognized this relationship with machine guarding and identified it in the LO/TO compliance directive.

LO/TO compliance directive

OSHA Instruction CPL02-00-147 became effective February 11, 2008. It is not a standard, regulation or any other type of substantive rule that can be enforced. It serves as a guide to OSHA compliance officers on how to enforce the LO/TO rule and related standards in a consistent and uniform fashion. This directive provides insight into OSHA’s interpretations of the LO/TO standard and applicable standards. It is a must read for anyone responsible for administering a LO/TO program in their workplace. It provides great examples of how LO/TO and machine guarding rules relate to each other.

Examples

The following two examples from OSHA’s LO/TO compliance directive illustrate the complementary relationship between the LO/TO standard and the machine guarding standard:

Example 1 (General): An employer who requires employees to perform servicing and/or maintenance while a machine or equipment is operating in the production mode must provide employee protection. Operations, such as lubricating, draining sumps, servicing filters, making simple adjustments, and inspecting for leaks and/or malfunction, are examples of routine operations that often can be accomplished with effective production-mode machine guarding as addressed in Subpart O. The LOTO standard does not apply if employee exposure to hazardous energy is eliminated through compliance with the Subpart O, machine guarding, requirements.

In contrast, the replacement of machine or process equipment components such as valves, gauges, linkages or support structure is not considered a normal routine maintenance function that can be safely accomplished during machine or equipment operation. Such maintenance requires LO/TO.

Example 2 (Specific): In a machine shop, a milling machine operator must adjust the flow of coolant oil to parts being milled while the cutting tool is in operation. This operation, which is part of the normal production process for the machine, is covered by the machine guarding requirements, which prevent employee contact with nip points and other points of operation. However, if it becomes necessary to perform an adjustment which requires the operator to bypass a guard or to place any part of his/her body in an area where work is performed on the material or where a danger zone exists during the machine’s operating cycle, the LO/TO standard would then apply.

Summary

Employee protection from hazardous energy during normal production activities is generally accomplished by compliance with applicable machine guarding standards found in Subpart O. If maintenance and/or servicing activities take place during normal production activities, and the operator is required to remove or bypass machine guarding required by subpart O, or place any part of their body in an area where unexpected startup of the machine or equipment may cause injury, the LO/TO standard would apply. If unsure about a maintenance and/or service activity falling under normal production conditions, always play it safe and lock it out. 

KEYWORDS: lockout/tagout (LOTO)

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Wesley J. Maertz, CSP CET, is a technical safety specialist at Grainger, a leader in safety services and solutions, offering technical support and training to help customers comply with workplace safety regulations and safeguard facilities.

For more information on creating a safer working environment, visit http://safety.grainger.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Facility Safety
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Occupational Safety
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Automated loading dock equipment

After March 2026 Rivian Death, Safety Managers Reassess Loading Dock Systems Under OSHA's Warehouse Emphasis Program

psychology in the workplace

Most Workplaces Measure Psychological Safety, Ignoring Psychosocial Risks

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • OSHA proposes $79,000 in fines to Danbury, Conn., firm for machine guarding and lockout/tagout hazards (9/24)

    See More
  • When machine guarding fails...

    See More
  • Machine guarding lack leads to Texas worker’s death

    See More

Related Directories

  • Dynatect Manufacturing Inc.

    Manufacturer of dynamic equipment protection, machine safety doors, safety pit covers, scissors lift guarding, machine guarding. Protection for equipment in motion.
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing