This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Editions
    • Archives
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Environment
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Government Regulations
    • Health
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • Product Case Studies
    • Psychology
    • Safety Culture
    • Training
    • Transportation Safety
    • More Topics
  • Construction
  • Oil & Gas
  • Columns
    • Editorial Comments
    • Best Practices
    • Positive Cultures
    • Training Strategies
    • Closing Time
    • FR Protection
    • Thought Leadership
  • Products
  • Conventions
    • Convention Companion
  • Multimedia
    • eBooks
    • Infographics
    • Photo Galleries
    • ISHN Podcasts
    • Your Digital Mentor Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • ISHN YouTube Videos
  • More
    • Awards
      • 2020 Readers' Choice Awards- Submit Products
    • eNewsletters
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Product Case Studies
    • Product Innovations
    • Showrooms
    • Vendor News
  • Advertise
    • Contact
Home » OSHA issues final silica rule
For Distributors Only

OSHA issues final silica rule

Industry questions feasibility of reaching lower exposure limits

final silica rule
May 5, 2016
KEYWORDS crystalline silica / occupational exposure limits / silica rule
Reprints

Think about the PPE sales potential here: about 2.3 million workers are exposed to respirable crystalline silica in their workplaces, including two million construction workers who drill, cut, crush, or grind silica-containing materials such as concrete and stone, and 300,000 workers in general industry operations such as brick manufacturing, foundries, and hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking. OSHA in March issued a final rule to curb lung cancer, silicosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and kidney disease in America’s workers by limiting their exposure to respirable crystalline silica.

The rule is comprised of two standards, one for Construction and one for General Industry and Maritime.

Key provisions

• Reduces the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for respirable crystalline silica to 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air, averaged over an eight-hour shift.

• Requires employers to: use engineering controls (such as water or ventilation) to limit worker exposure to the PEL; provide respirators when engineering controls cannot adequately limit exposure; limit worker access to high exposure areas; develop a written exposure control plan; offer medical exams to highly exposed workers; and train workers on silica risks and how to limit exposures.

• Provides medical exams to monitor highly exposed workers and gives them information about their lung health.

• Provides flexibility to help employers — especially small businesses — protect workers from silica exposure.

Compliance schedule

Both standards contained in the final rule take effect on June 23, 2016, after which industries have one to five years to comply with most requirements, based on the following schedule:

Construction — June 23, 2017, one year after the effective date.

General Industry and Maritime — June 23, 2018, two years after the effective date.

Hydraulic Fracturing — June 23, 2018, two years after the effective date for all provisions except engineering controls, which have a compliance date of June 23, 2021.

Background

The U.S. Department of Labor first highlighted the hazards of respirable crystalline silica in the 1930s, after a wave of worker deaths. The department set standards to limit worker exposure in 1971, when OSHA was created. But the standards are far outdated and do not adequately protect workers from silica-related diseases. Plus, workers are being exposed to silica in new industries such as stone or artificial stone countertop fabrication and hydraulic fracturing.

The final rule was proposed in September 2013. The rule-making process allowed OSHA to solicit input in various forms for nearly a full year. The agency held 14 days of public hearings, during which more than 200 stakeholders presented testimony, and OSHA accepted over 2,000 comments, amounting to about 34,000 pages of material.

Is this the end of the debate on silica?

“Far from it,” says Aaron Trippler, government affairs director for the American industrial Hygiene Association, writing in his Happenings on the Hill newsletter. “Industry has already stated it will challenge the final rule in court. Congress has two different approaches to get involved, albeit only one is really a viable approach.

“The first is the use of the Congressional Review Act to override the final rule. Problem with this is that even if Congress overrides the final rule the President is likely to veto the effort.

“The more likely approach is that Congress will attempt to incorporate a budget rider on the OSHA budget that will ban OSHA from spending any dollars on the silica final rule, including enforcement. In the last budget cycle the House placed such a rider on OSHA but the rider was removed when the final omnibus bill was introduced and enacted. I expect Congress to try this approach again.”

Industry opposition

The final silica rule will be expensive and difficult for employers to meet and ignores the benefits of respiratory devices in reducing silica dust exposure, argue employer representatives.

The Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica rule will reduce the permissible exposure for crystalline silica to 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air, averaged over an eight-hour shift, from the current 100 micrograms per cubic meter of air standard for general industry, despite industry contention that the lower limit is unattainable.

It’s a major economic impact on employers in a broad range of industries and particularly on a handful of industries like the oil and gas well industry for fracking and the construction industry, according to industry critics.

OSHA estimated the rule would provide average net benefits of about $2.8 billion to $4.7 billion annually over the next 60 years and would cost $1,242 a year for the average workplace. However, a study last year by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition pegged the cost of the silica rule on the U.S. construction industry at $5 billion per year compared to the agency’s $511 million estimate.

DC analysis

The Washington, D.C. law firm of Keller & Heckman posted a recent article stating, “OSHA’s silica rule has been a source of contention between employers, labor representatives, and the agency since its inception, due in large part to the fact that silica exposures can occur naturally as a result of ambient environmental conditions, there are severe limitations in silica testing technologies, and ambient environmental conditions cause inherent errors in any in-field testing applications. Further, OSHA’s requirement in the rule that employers adopt engineering controls to limit exposures over other available technology, such as respiratory protection, has led to significant concerns over whether employers can actually comply with the new rule due to technology limitations and fiscal feasibility.

“Some of the comments and testimony the agency received in response to its proposed rule noted the following:

• “Industry believes the cost to comply is substantially higher than estimated, particularly given that some workplaces will need customized ventilation systems to achieve compliance.

• “OSHA’s rule continues to require that employers use engineering controls over respiratory controls, ignoring the substantial improvement in the design and performance of a wide variety of respirators since the so-called hierarchy of controls was first adopted. Industry submitted evidence that such devices would be more effective for exposures from cutting, grinding, crushing or drilling silica-containing materials such as concrete, masonry, tile, and rock.

“As the new rule imposes a significant reduction in the PEL and requires extensive engineering and administrative controls, compliance with the new rule will likely require substantial investment from employers. In addition to employer concerns over potential compliance costs, the contention surrounding technological feasibility of the rule’s sampling requirements and exposure controls has not dissipated. Many expect there will be a judicial challenge to the rule shortly involving a number of industries and proponents of the standard.”

Subscribe to ISHN Magazine

Related Articles

Eight construction groups quick to challenge OSHA’s final silica rule in court

OSHA’s proposed silica rule a long way from being finalized

Related Products

ISHN January 2019 Issue

ISHN October 2019 Issue

Related Events

ASSE to host virtual symposium on new OSHA Walking-Working Standard

Related Directories

Mystic Air Quality Consultants Inc.

Clothes Cleaning Systems

Subscribe For Free!
  • Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • ISHN eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

Today's News

2 young part-time UPS workers killed in California

Today's News

Steel worker injured at Indiana plant

incident investigation

How to investigate a worksite incident

ambulance

Buffalo Wild Wings manager dies after exposure to toxic cleaning product fumes

Tesla

Report finds worker injuries are “routine” at Tesla’s Nevada plant

ISHN Readers' Choice Awards 2020 product submissions


Events

March 7, 2019

Safety and Wellness: The Combination that Drives Engagement and Profitability

On Demand Attend this webinar for the keys to success, as well as mistakes to avoid, when targeting safety and wellness with a Recognition & Reward Program.

View All Submit An Event

ISHN Podcasts


ISHN Podcasts

ISHN Magazine

ISHN1219_cover.jpg

2019 December

Among the articles in the December 2019 issue of ISHN Magazine, we have expert insight on selecting the right respirator, a link to the 2020 Buyers’ & Resource Guide, 10 safety mistakes that can land you in a courtroom, and much more.
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • List Rental
    • Safety A-Z
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Web Exclusives
    • Privacy Policy
  • Want More
    • Connect
    • Subscribe
    • Survey And Sample

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing