ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!
PPE

When hearing protectors are required, calculate their noise reduction efficiency

Attention to attenuation

By Judie Smithers
hearing protectors and their efficiency
February 1, 2017

When your workplace is noisy, your first reaction is to have affected employees wear hearing protection devices (HPDs). But you need details on each employee’s exposure and the effectiveness of the HPD you provide before you can know for certain that each worker is protected.

Noise monitoring

It’s time to conduct noise monitoring if normal conversation is difficult because of the noise, employees complain about the loudness of the work area, or something indicates that employees are losing their hearing.

Whether you use dosimeters to conduct personal noise monitoring or sound level meters to create “noise maps,” the goal of noise monitoring is to identify those employees who are exposed to noise at a level equal to or exceeding an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exposure of 85 decibels (dB). Under OSHA standard 1910.95, this exposure is called the “action level” and is equivalent to a dose of noise that is half of the 8-hour TWA permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 90 dB.

Be sure to let employees observe the monitoring and give individual employees their monitoring results if they’re exposed at or above this action level.

Providing HPDs

Aside from identifying employees to include in your hearing conservation program, your noise monitoring results help you make decisions about HPDs.

You must make HPDs available to all employees exposed at or above the action level (at no cost to the employees). You must require each employee exposed above the 8-hour TWA PEL of 90 dB to wear the HPDs.

HPDs are also required to be worn by any employee who is exposed at or above the action level and has not yet had his or her baseline audiogram established.

In addition, you must require HPDs to be worn by any employee who, based on the results of annual audiometric testing, experiences a standard threshold shift (STS). An STS, determined from the results of annual audiograms, is a change in hearing threshold relative to the baseline audiogram of an average of 10 dB or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in either ear.

OSHA expects employers to offer each affected employee a choice of at least one type of earplug and one type of ear muff; however, the agency expects the employee’s selection to be “suitable” in that they not only adequately protect the worker’s hearing but are comfortable to wear. You may need to provide more than one type of earplug or ear muff so that an employee can select protection that he finds comfortable. Each person’s ear canal is different. Ear plug (and ear muff) manufacturers offer products in different sizes, shapes, and materials to fill the need for comfortable protectors.

HPD attenuation

The HPDs must effectively reduce the noise reaching the worker’s ears to a level that is at or below the 8-hour TWA PEL of 90 dB. For employees who have experienced an STS, hearing protector attenuation must be sufficient to reduce employee exposure to an 8-hour TWA of 85 dB, or below.

A common method of estimating how much the HPD will reduce the noise is to use the EPA’s Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) value that must show on the HPD’s packaging.

Because HPDs in actual use typically provide less protection than indicated in a laboratory testing environment, OSHA takes a cautious approach to using NRR values.

Using mandatory Appendix B to §1910.95, you are to first obtain the employee’s 8-hour TWA exposure level (using an A-weighted dosimeter or sound level meter). Next, subtract 7 dB from the HPD’s NRR value, and subtract the remainder from the employee’s 8-hour TWA exposure level to obtain the estimated 8-hour TWA exposure under the ear protector.

To adjust for workplace conditions, OSHA strongly recommends applying a 50 percent correction factor when estimating field attenuation. This is especially important when considering whether engineering controls are to be implemented. When you do this, the estimated exposure = TWA - [(NRR - 7) x 50%]

For example, an employee is exposed at an 8-hour TWA of 95 dB, and his ear plugs have an NRR value of 30. The estimated exposure is: 95 - [(30-7) x 0.5] or 95 - (23 x 0.5) or 95 - 11.5 or 83.5 dB. In this example, the ear plugs reduce the employee’s exposure from 95 dB to 83.5 dB. The ear plugs actually reduce the exposure by 11.5 dB, not the NRR value of 30. The ear plugs provide adequate protection because they reduce the employee’s exposure to a level that is well below OSHA’s PEL.

Dual HPD protection

When the noise is excessive, you may think that adding ear muffs over earplugs will provide twice the protection as ear plugs alone, but this isn’t the case. In practice, the extra HPD reduces the exposure by only 5 dB.

OSHA does not specify when double hearing protection is needed. The noise standard does not have additional requirements for hearing protectors when any certain peak noise levels are reached. It’s up to the employer to determine if dual protection is appropriate.

Here’s a sample calculation when dual protection is used. An employee’s 8-hour TWA exposure is 110 dB. He is wearing earplugs with an NRR value of 29 and ear muffs having an NRR value of 25.

To calculate the attenuation, first calculate field adjusted NRR for the better protector. In this case it’s the earplugs. Using the same formula from the previous example, you have: [(29 -7) x 0.5] = 11 dB. Next, add 5 dB to this field-adjusted NRR. You have 11 + 5 = 16 dB. Finally, subtract the attenuation value from the employees 8-hour TWA exposure, or: 110 -16 dB = 94 dB.

In this example, the protected 8-hour TWA is 94 dB. This hearing protection is not adequate, and better hearing protection must be used. If feasible, engineering controls must be implemented.

Follow-up

You don’t have to re-evaluate your HPD selections or fit HPDs on any set schedule. However, the adequacy of hearing protector attenuation is to be re-evaluated whenever employee noise exposures increase to the extent that your HPDs may no longer provide adequate attenuation. 

In addition to keeping track of the workplace noise level, you must conduct annual training. The session is to include information on the purpose of hearing protectors; the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types; and instructions on selection, fitting, use, and care. Take this opportunity to find out if any employees are having problems with their HPDs, and check to be certain your workers are wearing the HPDs correctly.

KEYWORDS: hearing conservation hearing protection noise

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Judie Smithers is an editor -  workplace safety with J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc., Neenah, Wis.; (800) 558-5011; www.jjkeller.com.

She is also authorized as an OSHA General Industry Outreach Trainer.

 

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Workplace Training Strategies
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Occupational Safety
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Automated loading dock equipment

After March 2026 Rivian Death, Safety Managers Reassess Loading Dock Systems Under OSHA's Warehouse Emphasis Program

chemical safety

It Was Just Sugar: Catastrophic Safety Failures in Louisville

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • Hearing Protector Attenuation Ratings and the Benefits of Fit-Testing

    Behind the Numbers: Hearing Protectors

    See More
  • Hearing protection: Don’t rely solely on Noise Reduction Ratings for protection

    See More
  • Nightclub owners ignore high noise levels; neglect use of hearing protectors

    See More

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • September 22, 2016

    Bang! Damage from impulse noise and the effectiveness of hearing protection

    Some of the most hazardous sounds we hear are brief sounds – noises from impacts and impulses. These arise from sources like household tools, construction, industrial noise, firecrackers, guns, and even automotive airbags.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing