February 1, 2008
When it comes to PPE, the OSHA standard (29 CFR 1910) is unequivocal: “OSHA requires the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce employee exposure to hazards when engineering and administrative controls are not feasible or effective in reducing these exposures to acceptable levels.”
Despite the clarity of this requirement, the reality is that noncompliance in the workplace continues to be a concern. Eighty-seven percent of safety professionals surveyed at the National Safety Council (NSC) Congress in October 2007 said they had observed workers failing to wear PPE when they should have been.1 Eighty-five percent of safety professionals answered yes to the same question in a similar survey undertaken at the 2006 NSC Congress.1
Why not comply?
In an effort to understand the reasons for noncompliance, the 2007 survey asked why people failed to wear PPE when they should have been.
The main reason cited was “discomfort,” according to 62 percent of respondents who had observed noncompliance in the workplace. Next was, workers thinking PPE was not necessary for the task. These were followed by: too hot; fit poorly; unattractive-looking; not easily accessible from the site of the work task.
Comfort and style
Given the relationship between uncomfortable PPE and noncompliance, it’s not surprising that when asked what could be improved about the PPE they were currently purchasing, three-quarters of safety professionals surveyed said they would make it “more comfortable.”
The safety professionals surveyed were also in favor of more fashionable PPE. Eighty-four percent said that they would be more apt to purchase fashionable and attractive PPE if workers would be more likely to wear it and the price was comparable to what they were currently paying for similar products.
Users want solutions
The survey also asked what safety professionals sought from a supplier of PPE and other safety products. The top choice, at 86 percent, was a supplier that offers solutions to their problems. Providing innovative products was a distant second. This was followed by:
- Selling specific product categories;
- Providing a bundle of products for a one-stop, head-to-toe shopping experience;
- Offering just-in-time delivery;
- Offering stylish products.
While most discussions about PPE compliance typically focus on safety at work, an increasing number of companies are adopting the concept of “whole-person health” and the notion that it is important to protect employees off the job as well as on. Some survey results:
- 59 percent of the safety professionals surveyed at the 2007 NSC Congress said their organizations had programs in place to promote at-home safety.
- 28 percent said they did not have at-home safety programs, but hoped to implement them in the future.
- Only 10 percent said they did not have a program nor did they have plans to create one.
Clearly the majority of safety professionals surveyed subscribe to the notion that safety must be practiced 24/7, not just from 9-to-5. Whether this means wearing protective shoes and eyewear while mowing the lawn or a respirator mask while sanding floors, the goal is the same: keeping employees safe, whenever and wherever they are.
SIDEBAR: Survey MethodologyThe most recent survey1 was conducted at the NSC Congress in Chicago on October 16, 2007. The survey questionnaires were filled out by 197 safety professionals who reported being responsible for purchasing, selecting or influencing the purchase or selection of, or compliance with, PPE. Respondents were from the following fields: industrial manufacturing, construction, hazmat, emergency response, clean manufacturing, laboratories and science, healthcare, transportation, law enforcement and government. The 2006 survey1 was undertaken at the NSC Congress in San Diego on November 7, 2006. The survey questionnaires were filled out by 158 safety professionals. For full survey results, visit www.kcprofessional.com.
Footnote: 1 NSC surveys were conducted by Kimberly-Clark Professional.