ISHN logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ISHN logo
  • NEWS
    • Today's News
    • Global Safety News
    • Government Regulations
  • PRODUCTS
    • Product Innovations
    • Featured Products
  • TOPICS
    • Environmental Health and Safety
    • Facility Safety
    • Workplace Health
    • Occupational Safety
    • PPE
    • More Topics
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • COLUMNS
    • Best Practices
    • Dave Johnson: What’s going on
    • Editorial Comments
    • Leading Safety
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • ISHN Podcast
    • Videos
    • Cold Stress Education Quiz
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • MORE
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Newsletters
    • Convention Companion
    • Polls
    • Events
    • ISHN Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archived Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN TODAY!
Today's Safety News

MSHA puts 13 mines on notice for potential pattern of violations

November 29, 2010

The U.S. Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) announced last week that 13 mines from around the country received letters putting them on notice that each has a potential pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards under Section 104(e) of the federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. These are the first mining operations to receive such notification since MSHA implemented major reforms to its POV process, including tougher provisions for mines with chronic and persistent health and safety violations. A 14th mine, Upper Big Branch, met the criteria, but actions have been postponed until MSHA's investigation into the April 5 explosion is complete.

"I have been saying since I arrived at MSHA that the POV system is broken," said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health. "This screening represents a positive step forward, but it won't be the only step. POV is on MSHA's rulemaking agenda, and there are also statutory changes pending before Congress that would further improve the system."

Main also noted that the review process is not finished. "Once MSHA completes a thorough auditing, there may be more mines put on notice for a potential POV," he said. Audits are being conducted at mine operations that appear close to qualifying for a potential POV to track any underreporting of mine accidents and injuries.

MSHA's screening process, which covers enforcement actions during the 12-month period ending Aug. 31, 2010, identified mines with an elevated rate of significant and substantial, or S&S, violations. It also identified those that have been subject to closure orders, including closure orders for serious issues such as failing to correct violations after MSHA cites them, unwarrantable failures to comply with health or safety standards, failure to provide miners with required training and imminent dangers in the mine. Under the new criteria, MSHA also considered whether a mine has a high percentage of S&S violations involving elevated negligence, as well as a mine's injury severity rate, targeting operations with an above-average injury severity measure.

Mine operators can choose to institute a corrective action program with concrete, meaningful measures to reduce their S&S violations; achievable benchmarks and milestones for implementing the program; management oversight to ensure the program is being instituted and followed; and measures to find and fix the mine's specific compliance problems. Mines that implement a corrective action program will be required to meet the prescribed goals within a maximum of 110 days of receiving potential POV notification, depending upon when a corrective action program is submitted to MSHA.

Operators that do not choose to implement a corrective action program will be required to achieve the prescribed goals set by MSHA within 50 days of receiving a potential POV notification.

MSHA has established S&S violation rate-reduction goals for each mine that received a potential POV notification. In order to avoid receiving a POV notice, mines that do implement an appropriate corrective action program must reduce the S&S frequency rate per 100 inspection hours by 50 percent from the mine's rate during the 12-month review period, or to a rate within the top 50 percent for all mines of similar type and classification. Mines that do not implement an appropriate corrective action program must reduce the S&S frequency rate per 100 inspection hours by 70 percent from the mine's rate during the 12-month review period, provided such reduction is below the national rate for all mines of similar type and classification during the same period, or to a rate within the top 35 percent for all mines of similar type and classification.

Previously, mine operators were required to achieve only a 30 percent reduction to avoid POV actions and were not required to meet benchmarks where corrective action programs were used. Mines that failed to meet the requirements would be subject to the POV, at which point every S&S violation would result in an automatic closure order until the violation was abated. Mines would remain on POV status until a complete inspection found the mine free of S&S violations.

"Along with impact inspections and injunction actions, POV represents an important enforcement method for MSHA to change the behavior of mine operators who don't take seriously the health and safety of miners," said Main.

Editor's note: A complete list of the 13 mines can be found at www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/msha/20101119-PPOV-Mines.pdf. The applicable S&S frequency rate goals, POV screening criteria and procedures, and copies of letters sent to mine operators are posted on MSHA's POV Single Source Page at www.msha.gov/POV/POVsinglesource.asp.

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • forklift safety

    Exploring the latest technologies in forklift safety

    With more staff and more stock in warehousing now more...
    Workplace Training Strategies
    By: Josh Cramer
  • welding

    All about welder’s flash or arc eye

    A flash burn is a painful inflammation of the cornea,...
    Environmental Health and Safety
  • dangerous jobs

    The 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S.

    On-the-job deaths have been rising — hitting the highest...
    Transportation Safety
    By: Benita Mehta
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • ISHN Newsletter & Other Newsletter Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ISHN audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ISHN or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • man wearing the the Sundström SR200 Full Face Mask Respirator
    Sponsored byOHD

    5 Fit Testing Mistakes That Could Cost You

  • This image shows Magid AcuSpex polarized blue mirrored safety glasses.
    Sponsored byMagid Glove and Safety

    Construction PPE Guide: What Crews Need for Each Task

  • lone worker in confined space
    Sponsored byAlphasense Ltd.

    GET THE LEAD OUT of your Safety Oxygen Sensors!

Popular Stories

SpaceX 7 launch

OSHA Investigating Fatal Fall at SpaceX Starbase

Worker Impairment

How to Tell When a Co-Worker is Impaired? A Safety Pro’s Challenge

psychology in the workplace

Most Workplaces Measure Psychological Safety, Ignoring Psychosocial Risks

top 10 most dangerous jobs

Poll

Seasonal Readiness

With the federal heat stress prevention rule on the horizon, which area of your safety program needs the most attention?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

Surviving an OSHA Audit A Management Guide, 2nd Edition

See More Products

ISHN Podcasts

Related Articles

  • MSHA puts 10 operators on notice for potential pattern of violations (10/8)

    See More
  • MSHA takes steps to overhaul "broken" pattern of violations program (9/28)

    See More
  • MSHA to publish pattern of violations final rule

    See More

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • October 18, 2017

    ACGIH® TLV® For Audible Sound – Understanding the Proposed Notice of Intended Change to The Acgih® Tlv® for Noise

    Occupational noise exposures represent an important but under-recognized cause of disease and disability in the United States. Now titled as Audible Sound, the ACGIH® Threshold Limit Values for Physical Agents (TLV®-PA) Committee has proposed a revision to the TLV® for Noise.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Become a Leader in Safety Culture

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

JOIN TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing