Understand standards to manage safety in confined spaces
In construction and industry, some potential hazards visibly manifest, such as the risk of falls from heights. Others are more hidden. A confined space may not look dangerous, but workers perish each year because someone assumed the air inside was safe to breathe when testing would have revealed that is wasn’t.
In 2017, 166 workers died in incidents involving confined spaces, an increase of 15 percent from the previous year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The real tragedy is that such fatalities are potentially preventable by understanding and following OSHA requirements for entering confined spaces. Safety directors need to help inform workers which of the two confined space standards to follow and educate workers on the steps to take to help maintain compliance.
A look at two standards: General Industry and Construction
OSHA introduced the confined space standard for general industry (1910.146) first. It was intended for static environments, not agriculture, construction or shipyard work. In 2015, OSHA introduced the Confined Spaces in Construction standard (1926.1203) to guard against the unique hazards of confined space operations in dynamic environments.
The new standard caused some confusion, and enforcement was deferred to 2016. Part of the confusion stemmed from the many references to home construction in a related FAQ, which led some people in industry to think the standard did not apply to construction activities in plants. It does. It also applies to companies that are repairing an existing facility or replacing structures and their components, or performing a large, complex maintenance project. Maintenance work that does not involve new equipment or structures is usually covered under the General Industry standard.
The Confined Spaces in Construction standard doesn’t apply to excavations, which are regulated by §1926 subpart P—Excavations, except when workers have to enter a confined space (such as a pipe) within the excavation. In that case, instead of following the Excavation standard when measuring the atmosphere for levels of oxygen and flammable gasses, the contractor must meet the more stringent atmospheric thresholds, along with the other requirements of the Confined Spaces in Construction Standard.
This article should not be a substitute for advice, instruction or supervision with regard to your specific job. Consulting with shoring and excavation experts regarding your specific circumstances to ensure compliance with OSHA, and any other applicable rules or regulations is always recommended.
Additional areas of confusion
Companies often fail to follow two other provisions of the new standard. One is the competent person requirement.
The standard requires the presence of a competent person on site if a confined space will be entered. Many employers make the mistake of thinking they can tap any veteran employee for the role, but specialized knowledge is necessary, which requires formal training. The competent person must be able to identify existing and predictable hazards in a confined space and the area around it, be knowledgeable about appropriate testing, and be able to conduct initial testing as necessary. They need to know the maximum levels for each type of gas. In addition, they must have the authority to take prompt corrective action to eliminate any hazards that are found.
The other often-overlooked provision is the top-down reporting requirement in Permit Required Confined Spaces. The employer that owns or manages the property where the construction work is taking place is required to share any information it has about the hazards in the confined space with the general contractor, and the general contractor must pass this information down to any subcontractors doing work in the space. This requirement ensures that those who enter the space know the hazards they may face and can prepare for them. When the entrants have exited the space, the findings must be reported back up to the owner so that any new issues about the space may be documented for the next entry.
The cost of noncompliance
Companies that fail to comply with the appropriate standard could be subject to citations and fines, which can impact their reputations, their insurance premiums, and their bottom line. Of course, the real price to pay is the potential loss of life.
Safety directors should understand both standards and what they require. These safety professionals should also familiarize company executives with both confined space standards and when each applies so executives are better able to be active partners in worksite safety. Additionally, safety directors should ensure that all field personnel assigned the role of competent person receive the training they need in order to live up to the title.
Contractors doing things like opening a manhole on a worksite and using their noses to evaluate the air, is not effective. In fact, simply opening the entrance cover to a confined space may be dangerous if there’s a chance a hazard gas could escape (in which case, workers may need to insert a measuring device before opening the cover).
Fatalities don’t happen when you expect them, they happen when you don’t. The bottom line: Rather than assume an atmosphere is harmless, assume it isn’t. Testing is the only way to know for sure.