February 1st, 2013 the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH®) announced a revision to its good practice recommended Threshold Limit Value (TLV®) for manganese.(1) This action changed the TLV® from an 8-hour time weighted average (TLV-TWA) of 0.2 mg/m3 for total manganese (i.e. all particle sizes) to 0.02 mg/m3 for respirable size manganese particles.respirator table

Respirable particles are generally less than 4 micrometers (µm) in diameter, which includes welding fume. These particles can penetrate and be retained deep in the lungs. In addition, a TLV-TWA of 0.1 mg/m3 was added for inhalable manganese (particles less than 100 µm in diameter).

The respirable limit would be appropriate for evaluating tasks such as welding. The inhalable limit would be more appropriate for larger particle-generating tasks such as grinding. As many welders do both tasks, separate samples for each limit may need to be taken for a full exposure evaluation. Documentation is available from ACGIH® for manganese and its revised TLVs®.(3) These limits are being set to reduce potential for central nervous system impairment.

The current federal OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) for total manganese, including welding fume, remains unchanged at 5 milligrams per cubic meter of air (5 mg/m3).(2) In contrast to the TLVs, this PEL is a ceiling limit, which means the worker’s exposure shall, at no time, exceed the PEL — even instantaneously. While the TLVs are recommended good practice, the PELs are regulatory limits and must be complied with. States enforcing their own occupational safety and health programs may have different regulatory exposure limits from federal OSHA.

Background

Manganese is a grey-white metal used to produce a variety of important alloys and as a deoxidizing agent in weld wire to remove iron oxide from the weld pool. Welders and surrounding workers such as welding helpers can be exposed to manganese fume and dust during welding, grinding and other metalworking operations. Repeated, excessive exposure to manganese may cause manganism, also known as welder’s disease. Signs and symptoms of manganism include: weakness/lethargy, speech and psychological disturbances, paralysis and tremors.

Exposure data from shipyard workers indicates that the highest exposures to manganese fume come from shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), flux core arc welding (FCAW) and gas metal arc welding (GMAW).(5) The percentage of manganese in the welding rod or wire can significantly affect the content in the welding fume. Manganese content can range from less than 5 percent up to 15 percent in hard-facing applications. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the rods and wires can be used to determine manganese content.

Numerous studies indicate that welder exposure to manganese frequently exceeds the previous TLV® of 0.2 mg/m3 — ranging up to almost 25 times the obsolete TLV®. The Center for Construction Research and Training Chart Book(6) has a table showing the probability of the following construction trades being exposed to manganese above the now obsolete TLV®:

  • Boilermakers – 72%
  • Ironworkers – 15%
  • Pipefitters – 7%

In addition to welders, welder helpers and other nearby workers may also have significant exposure. These studies, using the old TLV® for assessment, indicate a definite need for employers to reassess their workers’ exposure in light of the revised TLV®s.

Worker exposure controls

Consult ANSI Z49.1:2012 Safety in Welding Cutting and Allied Processes for general welding safety recommendations. OSHA requires all feasible engineering controls be used to reduce worker exposure. Portable local exhaust units are one option.(4) Changing welding methodology may be another option. GMAW (or MIG) tends to produce less fume per unit of weld metal than SMAW (or “stick”). However, due to the increased efficiency of the wire-fed process, GMAW may equal the fume per unit time from SMAW.(5)

Respiratory protection for manganese exposure

In many cases, engineering controls alone may not reduce exposure levels below the exposure limit. Respiratory protection can be used to provide the needed worker protection. Select respirators based on results from an exposure assessment (e.g. air sampling, historical data) and the assigned protection factor (APF) as established in OSHA’s respirator standard 29 CFR 1910.134. Consider consulting a certified industrial hygienist (CIH) for help in exposure assessment and respiratory selection.

OSHA requires employers to implement a written respiratory protection program when respiratory protection is used. Elements of the written program include respirator selection, use, care and maintenance, medical evaluation, training and fit testing for tight fitting respirators. In addition, users must read, understand and follow all recommendations and limitations in the respirator manufacturer’s user instructions.

Respirator selection

The table above shows examples of suggested minimum respiratory protection for manganese up to the maximum use concentrations based on the OSHA respirator APFs and ACGIH® TLV® of 0.02 mg/m3 for the respirable fraction. The welder can always use a higher level of protection. The user will need to decide on specific respiratory protection based on their unique job situation.

With careful exposure assessments, selection and implementation of engineering and personal protective equipment controls, contractors and welders can significantly reduce the occurrence of manganism and other manganese-related diseases in the workforce.

 

References

1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Annual Reports for the Year 2012: Committees on Threshold Limit Values (TLVs®) and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs®), ACGIH: Cincinnati, OH, 2013.

2. “Air Contaminants,” Code of Federal Regulations Title 29, Part 1926.55, Appendix A.

3. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, http://www.acgih.org/.

4. Meeker, John D., Susi, Pam and Flynn, Michael R. (2007) Manganese and Welding Fume Exposure and Control in Construction Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 4:12, 943-951.

5. Harris, Mike Welding Processes and Fume Production (2012) The Synergist 24:1, 22-23.

6. Center for Construction Research and Training (2007) The Construction Chart Book 4th Ed. (www.cpwr.com)